GDG- 59th New York at the Wall
Jack Kelly
jmkelly at norwoodlight.com
Thu Jul 17 16:27:16 CDT 2008
Oh, sorry, I neglected to mention the source. The Gettysburg magazine Issue
#39 (the newest issue).
Regards,
Jack Kelly
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard M Kadas" <rkadas at sbcglobal.net>
To: "GDG" <gettysburg at arthes.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: GDG- 59th New York at the Wall
> Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
>
>
> Reading your summary of Zach Fry's piece on tht 59th of NY's stand at the
> wall made me want to read it also. Could you please share the reference as
> other Lurkers might share my interest.
> Dick
>
> Jack Kelly <jmkelly at norwoodlight.com> wrote:
> Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> Just finished Zach Fry's analysis of the 59th NY's stand at the wall on
> July 2nd and 3rd. I must admit that I originally felt that the 59th did
> indeed collapse during the PPT Charge, but he has changed my mind with his
> excellent article. The gap between the right flank of the 59th NY and the
> left flank of the 69th PA (at "Brown's Gate") is the critical point in his
> analysis. No experienced infantryman would position himself in a gap in
> the stone wall, especially when there is artillery firing canister
> directly behind him, so I am sure that the boys in the 59th NY
> instinctively moved to their left to gain the cover of the intact stone
> wall. When the Confederates poured through the Brown's Gate gap, the
> natural thing for experienced infantrymen to do would be to refuse their
> line, which Zach points out.
> Cowan's description of men running through his battery has always puzzled
> me, but Zach points out an interesting fact; G and K companies of the 69th
> PA were in front of at least one of Cowan's guns (a very nasty place to
> be) and were taking casualties from Cowan's "friendly" fire. You bet that
> I'd bail out of that position real fast, and regroup somewhere back of the
> battery. I think that some of the lads in G and K of the 69th did exactly
> that, as evidenced by Cowan's testimony.
> Good job, Zach.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jack Kelly
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> You may unsubscribe by going to
> http://mailman.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg
>
> You can add yourself to the GDG map at:
> http://www.frappr.com/gettysburgdiscussiongroup
>
> View archived posts from May 2004 - present at
> http://mailman.arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg/
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> You may unsubscribe by going to
> http://mailman.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg
>
> You can add yourself to the GDG map at:
> http://www.frappr.com/gettysburgdiscussiongroup
>
> View archived posts from May 2004 - present at
> http://mailman.arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg/
>
More information about the Gettysburg
mailing list