GDG- Re: Shelby Foote
Dennis Lawrence
denlaw at fone.net
Mon Feb 4 15:14:58 CST 2008
Hello,
There is a distinction that needs to be made between the academic
writing and popular writing here. Editors/publishers of popular histories
hate footnotes. Many writers will have a difficult time getting them
included. Editors of scholarly history demand foot notes and you cannot
publish without them.
Different audiences, purposes and needs.
Take Care
Dennis
At 12:34 PM 2/4/2008, you wrote:
>Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
>
>
>With all the discussion on whether it is good to include footnotes or not, I
>did a little browse through my library to see who may not have used
>footnotes. Others who didn't use footnotes were American Heritage in
>their The Civil
>War, which many of us cut our Civil War teeth on, Douglas Southall Freeman
>in Lee's Lieutenants, Edward Bearss in Fields of Honor, and Carl Sandburg in
>his epic biography on Lincoln, which I believe won the Pulitzer Prize for
>history. At least there were none in any of those editions which I have.
>
>Just a note from a lurker.
>
>John Jorgensen
>
>
>
>**************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music.
>(http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp003000000025
>48)
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>You may unsubscribe by going to
>http://mailman.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg
>
>You can add yourself to the GDG map at:
>http://www.frappr.com/gettysburgdiscussiongroup
>
>View archived posts from May 2004 - present at
>http://mailman.arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg/
More information about the Gettysburg
mailing list