GDG- Three Lines, Two Lines
James Cameron
cameron2 at optonline.net
Sat Sep 1 17:22:52 CDT 2007
I don't have any strong opinion one way or the other, but OTOH have never
seen anything extremely compelling to indicate Pettigrew's division was
formed in two lines. I don't rule it out, but, having each regiment
deployed in two lines seems to me to shorten the overall division line a
great deal. Also, I'd wonder why accounts of the charge, from survivors,
don't seem to mention rear rank companies coming up to support the first
rank. Of course, CW regiments could and did deploy in formations other than
a single line of battle, so lack of mention doesn't mean it didn't happen
here.
One thing I do think is possible is that the late start by Pettigrew's two
left wing brigades, Davis and Brockenbrough, compared to his two right wing
brigades, may have given Union observers the impression of the advance being
in multiple lines, by design. Walter Taylor, in fact, commented opn how the
uneven nature of the advance made it appear the division was advancing en
echelon.
Jim Cameron
More information about the Gettysburg
mailing list