GDG- Cyclorama Painting
Margaret D. Blough
mdblough1 at comcast.net
Fri May 4 23:01:55 CDT 2007
Jim,
Even more ironically, the Cyclorama Building was failing to perform these functions so badly that they shifted these functions to a building, the current visitors center and former Rosensteel-owned private museum, that they'd bought planning to tear it down.
Regards,
Margaret
-------------- Original message --------------
From: James Cameron <cameron2 at optonline.net>
> Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
>
>
> << Another factor which convinces me that the Cyclorama building was of a
> terrible design - both functionally and asthetically.
>
> The darn thing couldn't properly display the painting, and it couldn't keep
> the damn rain out either.
>
> J.D. >>
>
> That's what I always found ironic about the efforts of Neutra's fans to
> prevent the removal of the building. It's a structure with almost literally
> from day one failed in the main functions it was designed for, that of
> serving as an adequate visitor center, and, as a facility for display of the
> cyclorama. Whatever architectural values its supporters may see in it, as a
> NPS facility, the building was a dreadful botch.
>
>
> Jim Cameron
>
> "It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting,
> but for freedom - and for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with
> life itself."
> >From the Declaration of Arbroath.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> You may unsubscribe by going to
> http://mailman.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg
>
> You can add yourself to the GDG map at:
> http://www.frappr.com/gettysburgdiscussiongroup
>
> View archived posts from May 2004 - present at
> http://mailman.arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg/
More information about the Gettysburg
mailing list