GDG- (no subject)
Batrinque at aol.com
Batrinque at aol.com
Wed May 2 20:26:30 CDT 2007
In a message dated 5/2/2007 8:58:55 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
pennmardel at mchsi.com writes:
I think there were two important factors at play here. ... The other is
more practical in that Confederate
corps were on avarage twice the size of Union corps, so it made good sense
to have a higher ranking general in charge. A Union corps had about
10-12,000, while a Rebel corps in the ANV had 22-24,000.
But we must note that when the Army of the Potomac reorganized early in 1864
to have fewer and larger corps, the old model of major generals as corps
commanders was retained.. And, heck, Union army commanders were major generals
as well.
Bruce Trinque
Amston, CT
************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
More information about the Gettysburg
mailing list