GDG- "Pickett's Charge" NOT a misnomer

[Jim Lamason]

I whole heartedly agree with this assessment. 

Picketts Charge, no matter how much we talk about the REST of the soldiers
who were part of that moment in history, will never be able to get away from
the singular use of his name. 

It has already noted in another pat of this thread how much the other troops
took part from Trimble and Pettigrew. 

I also think the fact Picketts wife did almost every thing in her power to
enhance his reputation. 

Jim 



-----Original Message-----
From: gettysburg-bounces at arthes.com [mailto:gettysburg-bounces at arthes.com]
On Behalf Of Robert Lawrence
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 3:18 PM
To: GDG
Subject: RE: GDG- "Pickett's Charge" NOT a misnomer

Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:


Well regardless of what we call it this is still the best analysis of
the importance of the  Charge I have run across.

For every Southern boy fourteen years old, not once but whenever he
wants it, there is the instant when it's still not yet two oclock on
that July afternoon in 1863, the brigades are in position behind the
rail fence, the guns are laid and ready in the woods and the furled
flags are already loosened to break out and Pickett himself with his
long oiled ringlets and his hat in one hand probably and his sword in
the other looking up the hill waiting for Longstreet to give the word
and it's all in the balance, it happened yet, it hasn't even begun yet,
it not only hasn't begun yet but there is still time for it not to begin
against that position and those circumstances which made more men than
Garnett and Kemper and Armistead and Wilcox look grave yet it's going to
begin, we all know that, we have come too far with too much at stake and
that moment doesn't even need a fourteen-year-old boy to think THIS
TIME. MAYBE THIS TIME with all this much to lose and all this much to
gain: Pennsylvania, Maryland, the world, the golden dome of Washington
itself to crown with desperate and unbelievable victory....

---William Faulkner, INTRUDER IN THE DUST (1948) pp. 194-195  

<<-----Original Message-----
<<From: gettysburg-bounces at arthes.com 
<<[mailto:gettysburg-bounces at arthes.com] On Behalf Of Todd Estabrooks
<<Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 6:30 AM
<<To: gettysburg at arthes.com
<<Subject: GDG- "Pickett's Charge" NOT a misnomer
<<
<<Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
<<
<<
<<I don't know how touchy this topic is among Gettysburg 
<<historians, but it seems to me that all things considered, it 
<<is still appropriate to call the assault on day 3 "Pickett's 
<<Charge". I realize that Pickett did not command all of the 
<<forces on the field, but his division was the lead, and the 
<<others, especially Trimble's, were intended as support.
<<
<<Moreover, as Earl J. Hess said, "Pickett's Charge" is alot 
<<easier to say than "Pickett-Pettigrew-Trimble assault". And 
<<you won't have to explaign what you're talking about with 
<<non-experts that way.
<<
<<Just my two-cents.
<<                   
<<----------------------------------------------------------------
<<You may unsubscribe by going to 
<<http://mailman.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg
<<
<<You can add yourself to the GDG map at: 
<<http://www.frappr.com/gettysburgdiscussiongroup
<<
<<View archived posts from May 2004 -  present at 
<<http://mailman.arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg/
<<
 
----------------------------------------------------------------
You may unsubscribe by going to
http://mailman.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg

You can add yourself to the GDG map at:
http://www.frappr.com/gettysburgdiscussiongroup

View archived posts from May 2004 -  present at
http://mailman.arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg/