GDG- "Gettysburg Retreat: Cavalry in the Spotlight": Uggghhh!
Tom Ryan
pennmardel at mchsi.com
Sat Jun 9 10:18:35 CDT 2007
George,
You are doing a service by raising this issue, and could do further service
by writing a letter to the CWT editor citing the errors in the article. I
brought to the group's attention a similar case with regard to a new book
dealing with Jeb Stuart and Gettysburg where the author did not appear to
have a well-grounded basis for his assertions. The book contains a number
of errors that should have been easily spotted by the author and the editor
prior to publication.
It is important to question erroneous material before it becomes a part of
the historical lexicon by being repeated in other works.
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: gettysburg-bounces at arthes.com
[mailto:gettysburg-bounces at arthes.com]On Behalf Of George F
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 10:46 AM
To: gettysburg at arthes.com
Subject: GDG- "Gettysburg Retreat: Cavalry in the Spotlight": Uggghhh!
Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
I am not a big fan of CIVIL WAR TIMES. But my
daughter gave it to me for my birthday this year.
The latest issue is devoted to Gettysburg. Yea!
But there is a bad - no, terrible - article by
Jay Wertz entitled "Gettysburg Retreat: Cavalry
in the Spotlight".
I dont know Jay. And I dont have anything against
him. But I read the article with interest several
times. It is just full of errors and
inaccuracies. Really bad.
I offered to write an article on Falling Waters
for the magazine and CWT's said they didnt need
anything - a couple of years ago (thus my article
will be in STRATEGY & TACTICS). And I know that
both JD P and Eric W are the Cavalry experts here
- with another pending book on this very topic.
Why didnt CWT use them? Or others who at least
know what they are talking about?
One case in point - as most, if not all of you
know - much of the Falling Waters, Maryland
battlefield area is NOT within the boundries of
the NPS's C&O Canal Historical Park area. It is
nearly two miles up Falling Waters Road on both
sides of the road. Not according to Mr. Wertz. He
seems to equate where markers are with where the
action took place. And in fact a good chunk of
the land at the tip of Falling Waters Road that
he writes about is a private fish and game club -
NOT NPS property.
It is for all these very reasons that we
submitted Falling Waters, MARYLAND to the CWPT as
anendangered Civil War battlefield. Ironically,
it is listed in the front of the same issue of
CWT in an article on the CWPTs 2007 MOST
ENDANGERED battlefields. Development is gobbling
up what is left of the land where the last
engagement of the Gettysburg Campaign was fought
on July 14, 1863.
And throughout the article there are many more
errors.
It seems said when there are great writers and
true experts (I exclude myself - and highlight
Eric W and JD P) it is sad that such poor
historical journalism is published for
consumption by mass Civil War enthusiasts.
What are your thoughts on Mr. Wertz's article?
Respectfully,
George Franks
Bethesda, Maryland
____________________________________________________________________________
________
Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo!
FareChase.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/
---------------------------------------------------------
-------
You may unsubscribe by going to
http://mailman.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg
You can add yourself to the GDG map at:
http://www.frappr.com/gettysburgdiscussiongroup
View archived posts from May 2004 - present at
http://mailman.arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg/
More information about the Gettysburg
mailing list