GDG- Re: Meade's pursuit
Biggsk at aol.com
Biggsk at aol.com
Mon Jan 15 15:25:42 CST 2007
Dennis Lawrence writes:
I think this was a public stance, but the defeat at Gettysburg was a heavy
blow to the entire Confederacy, Falling Waters notwithstanding. Lee and
Davis both knew that.
Dennis,
Based on my reading of loads of Southern newspapers of the time, this did
not seem to be the case. The press noted the defeat as a big setback but not a
heavy blow, but then rallied to Lee stating things like "we know Gen. Lee
will get his chance again to beat the Yankees." Their faith in Lee's ability
and that of his army was unshakeable. Though damaged, his army was still very
much intact. So long as that army was intact the Confederacy still had a
chance to hold the line in the East.
By contrast, the press reporting of Vicksburg was far more depressing and
that was the heavy blow for the Confederacy in the summer of 1863. Their
country was split in two, they no longer controlled the Mississippi River
(concluded after the fall of Port Hudson), and they lost an entire army (actually two
when you factor in Port Hudson's garrison). All of these were far more
damaging to the Confederacy on all levels.
Finally, the reporting on the loss of Middle Tennessee as Rosecrans moved on
Chattanooga, was also rated a bigger blow by the period press.
I have been reading period newspapers, north and south, for over 12 years
for my various research projects and I always read articles of interest outside
of what I am researching at the time. At some point I plan to write an
essay on how the Southern papers viewed the Summer of 1863 and then one for how
the northern press did the same.
Greg Biggs
More information about the Gettysburg
mailing list