GDG- Re:rifles versus smooth bores
Batrinque at aol.com
Batrinque at aol.com
Tue Feb 27 06:14:53 CST 2007
In a message dated 2/26/07 7:52:50 PM Pacific Standard Time,
cameron2 at optonline.net writes:
>
> With little or no training in the use of the adjustable rear sight at longer
>
> ranges, or, for that matter, range estimation, and what with the officers
> generally waiting until 250 yards or less to order their men to open fire,
> my guess is that most troops on the line of battlenever raised the sight to
> begin with, much less lowered it as the enemy got closer. They would simply
>
> use the lowest, 100 yard setting as what in later wars would be called the
> "battle sight" setting, and let it go at that. And even with the high
> trajectory of a CW rifle musket, that does give acceptable enough results
> within that range.
The arching trajectory of a bullet fired from a rifle-musket (the initial
muzzle velocity was less than 1000 feet per second) was so pronounced that even
an error of only 10 yards in estimating the range of the target at 300 yards
(or in setting the rear sight) would send the round over the heads of the enemy
or into the ground at their feet; this situation is almost inconceivable to
those of us who trained on modern military firearms with their high muzzle
velocities and flat trajectories. I remember switching between targets at 50
yards and 300 yards on the firing range with my M16 with no adjustment to the
sights.
Bruce Trinque
Amston, CT
**************************************
AOL now offers free email to
everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.
More information about the Gettysburg
mailing list