GDG- Re: Three Lines - Two lines
Batrinque at aol.com
Batrinque at aol.com
Tue Aug 28 06:51:35 CDT 2007
In a message dated 8/27/2007 2:19:07 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
Batrinque at aol.com writes:
One thing that occurs to me is that if Pettigrew's division had been
deployed in the standard 2-rank line of battle, it would have stretched an
awfully
long ways northwards. I believe that Mike Priest in his book (and North &
South article) made such a calculation and reached some unlikely
conclusions
about how much the length of the battleline had shrunk by the time it got
to the
Emmitsburg Road; I think the numbers and situation make a lot more sense if
you start from an assumption that Pettigrew instead was deployed in a
double
line of battle.
The map on page 100 of Priest's "Into the Fight" indicates Pettigrew's
division advancing in a single line of battle near the Bliss Farm with a line some
1400 yards long (and this does not count half of Brockebrough's brigade,
left behind). On page 102, however, Priest refers to "Pettigrew's original
3,300-foot line". By way of contrast, in my "Confederate Battle Flags in the
July 3rd Charge" article in Issue 21 of Gettysburg Magazine, I use (holding that
Pettigrew was in a double line of battle) a length of "about 500 yards".
************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
More information about the Gettysburg
mailing list