GDG- f Virginia strikes us, are we not to strike back,
Dennis Lawrence
denlaw at kc.rr.com
Tue Apr 24 08:41:11 CDT 2007
Maryland's ex-senator (1845-1849) and recent delegate to the Peace
Conference wrote on April 24 that he desired an answer to his letter of
April 22 before he left Washington. A contemporary copy of the earlier
letter made by Joseph Holt, in the Lincoln Papers, reads in part as
follows: ``. . . . The existing excitement and alarm . . . of my own State
and of Virginia are owing . . . to an apprehension that it is your purpose
to use the military force you are assembling in this District for the
invasion of . . . these States.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Lincoln's Reply:
Confidential.
Hon. Reverdy Johnson Executive Mansion, April 24th 1861.
My dear Sir: Your note of this morning is just received. I forebore to
answer yours of the 22d because of my aversion (which I thought you
understood,) to getting on paper, and furnishing new grounds for
misunderstanding.
I do say the sole purpose of bringing troops here is to defend this capital.
I do say I have no purpose to invade Virginia, with them or any other
troops, as I understand the word invasion. But suppose Virginia sends her
troops, or admits others through her borders, to assail this capital, am I
not to repel them, even to the crossing of the Potomac if I can?
Suppose Virginia erects, or permits to be erected, batteries on the
opposite shore, to bombard the city, are we to stand still and see it done?
In a word, if Virginia strikes us, are we not to strike back, and as
effectively as we can?
Again, are we not to hold Fort Monroe (for instance) if we can? I have no
objection to declare a thousand times that I have no purpose to invade
Virginia or any other State, but I do not mean to let them invade us
without striking back. Yours truly
A. LINCOLN
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
[1] Copy, DLC-RTL.
But
Charleston hangs fire, and I wait no longer.
A. Lincoln
More information about the Gettysburg
mailing list