GDG- Re: BMI
Basecat1 at aol.com
Basecat1 at aol.com
Tue Oct 31 00:52:29 CST 2006
In a message dated 10/30/2006 6:39:20 PM Eastern Standard Time,
gettysburg-request at arthes.com writes:
Fishel's book is by no means a light read. It's the kind of work where you
really need to pay attention as you go along. But the time and effort
involved is well worth reading one of the most seminal books on the AOP
(despite the title, its focus is heavily on that army) to come out in recent
years. In my opinion, it does not go too far to say that anyone who has not
read Fishel is at a serious disadvantage in understanding the Gettysburg
Campaign.
It is interesting, though, how the intelligence gathered and, more
importantly, so accurately evaluated, by the BMI still seems to have such
limited influence on the mindset within much of the senior command of the
AOP that the ANV was so much larger than it actually was. Almost as if the
AOP's "corporate culture" was predisposed to act on the basis it was
outnumbered, even when, objectively, it should have known better.
Jim Cameron
Jim,
I could not agree more, and know I read the Fishel book at the wrong time,
and will probably have to read it again. I had just gotten back into the
study of the Civil War when the book came out, and his book was one of the first
I plundered through.
The notes at the back of the book are very thorough, and IMHO, could have
been made into a separate book itself. While the writing is very dry, and the
book can be a tough thing to wade through, Fishel supplies the reader with a
vast amount of information on a subject that has rarely been looked at.
It really is a fascinating look at how the Union command in the East got
their information on the Southern army, or misinformation they got before Sharpe
became more involved.
That said, when I finished reading it the first time, I danced a jig of
celebration, as I got through it eventually.:)
Regards from the Garden State,
Steve Basic
More information about the Gettysburg
mailing list