GDG- Wrights Brigade.
keith mackenzie
bluzdad at yahoo.com
Sun Nov 5 15:23:26 CST 2006
Thanks Jim! I kind of liked Tuckers take too. and there's something familiar about them reaching the top, only to be rejected. Who hasn't felt that way at least once? I understand Posey getting stuck piddling around the Bliss farm, but Mahone is a whole nuther kettle of fish. I checked him out in Larry Taggs book, and nothing happened to the guy. No one even mentions the fact that he never moved his troops foreward. Still, he went on to what seems to be a fairly successfull carreer, ending the war as one of Lee's more competent and trusted subordinates. Did Lee have an eye on this guys career all along? Is he an example of someone who survived the learning curve to fit nicely into Lees command structure?
K.
James Cameron <cameron2 at optonline.net> wrote:
Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
Keith,
Actually, I think Tucker used the correct term when he referred to what
Wright's brigade may have achieved as a "lodgment" rather than a
penetration. And too brief and unsupported for any possibility of either
maintaining or exploiting it. There's still some controversy about just how
far the brigade got. I personally think there's a good chance it reached
the Union line, achived a brief lodgment before being forced to retire, but
didn't actually break or penetrate it in the sense of gaining access to the
Union rear.
Wright's report is indeed one of the more unreliable ones to be found. But
it only serves to point out a broader problem students of the battle are
faced with. That is, that in studying this or any other part of the battle,
one is almost always faced with reports and other accounts, even those from
the same side, which differ so greatly in detail that they are simply
impossible to fully reconcile. These contradictions are inherent to the
written record, and cannot be resolved by the kind of selective editing and
interpretation of source material some indulge in. And attempting to come
up with a scenario which makes Wright's report seem to make sense, by
picking up where his brigade struck the Union line and dropping it north of
the Copse, runs into even more intractable problems. Including, and in
particular, the inescapable fact that the two batteries there which need to
have been overrun for such a theory to hold water, simply were not. No
batteries overrun north of the Copse, no Wright's brigade north of the
Copse.
Posey's brigade could well have reached the sector of the Union line north
of the Copse, had it been able to advance effectively and as a formation.
Which it was not. Likewise Mahone's, depending on exactly where it would
have advanced, which is of course hard to say exactly, since it never
happened.
Jim Cameron
----------------------------------------------------------------
You may unsubscribe by going to http://mailman.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg
You can add yourself to the GDG map at: http://www.frappr.com/gettysburgdiscussiongroup
View archived posts from May 2004 - present at http://mailman.arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg/
---------------------------------
Get your email and see which of your friends are online - Right on the new Yahoo.com
More information about the Gettysburg
mailing list