GDG- war councils
Chuck Teague
chaplain.chuck at gmail.com
Sun Dec 3 17:59:43 CST 2006
Meade later bristled at the suggestion that he was deferring to a vote of
his corps commanders, and for that reason did not want these meetings to be
called "councils of war."
Tom, I think your analysis is on target, though the word "deferred" is not
one I would use. He knew the final call was his and I think he was willing
to make it. As a professional soldier, he well knew that army high
command is not a democracy. However, under the circumstances, being new to
army command and wanting to make the very best call under precarious
conditions, I would hesitate to fault him for the method he used.
However, your question is a good one and an unsettling one: would Meade
have decided to stay had a majority of his lieutenants on the night of July
2 expressed their opinion that a retreat was in order?
I think Meade deserves credit and honor for his command of the army at
Gettysburg, but I also well know that anyone who questions his leadership in
any way does so at some peril. There are some today who take umbrage at the
idea that Meade at critical moments was uncertain what to do.
Yours with respect,
Chuck
More information about the Gettysburg
mailing list