GDG- Arty Anti-personnel Effectiveness
Norman Levitt
njlevitt at hotmail.com
Sat Dec 2 17:23:35 CST 2006
>From: keith mackenzie <bluzdad at yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: GDG <gettysburg at arthes.com>
>To: GDG <gettysburg at arthes.com>
>Subject: Re: GDG- Arty Anti-personnel Effectiveness
>Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 14:55:47 -0800 (PST)
>
>Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
>
>
>Doesn't happen very often, but I had to look this one up:
>
>
> tendentious \ten-DEN-shuhs\, adjective:
>Marked by a strong tendency in favor of a particular point of view.
>
> All types of social disagreements seem to be routed almost inexorably
>into the tendentious jargon and intellectually impoverished categories of
>legal reasoning, until everyone from Alan Dershowitz to the guy fixing your
>radiator insists on giving you his opinion about fundamental rights, or
>presumptions of innocence, or probable cause, or--God help us--"what the
>Constitution requires."
>-- Paul F. Campos, Jurismania: The Madness of American Law
>
> Just in case I wasn't the only one.
> K.
>
Hear, hear!! I stand foursquare behind the principle that one should
unremittingly eschew recondite and sesquipedalian locutions.
NL
_________________________________________________________________
View Athletes Collections with Live Search
http://sportmaps.live.com/index.html?source=hmemailtaglinenov06&FORM=MGAC01
More information about the Gettysburg
mailing list