GDG- Stuart and the historians

[Richard M Kadas]

In your scenario on which date does Stuart report in to Lee? Is it in time for him to realize his superiority in troop strength and position on 1 July? Finally, is the conclusion in the scenario that Lee wins GB or that no major engagement occurs there?
  Dick

Tim Gennett <k9wx at iquest.net> wrote:
  Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:


John, if Stuart abandons his plan once he encounters Hancock, what route 
does he then take to fulfill his mission of joining up with Ewell, how long 
does it take him, and where do he and Ewell meet? I realize this requires 
some speculation, but would be interested in your point of view.

Regards, Tim

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Baniszewski" 
To: 
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 19:18
Subject: GDG- Stuart and the historians


> Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
>
>
> From the way Lee phrased his orders to Stuart, I think Lee should be held 
> responsible for authorizing Stuart's raid. He did not say "I approve", 
> but he sure did not say "I disapprove" -
>
> Lee to Stuart, June 23 - "If General Hooker's army remains inactive, you 
> can leave. should he not appear to be moving northward, I think you had 
> better withdraw this side of the mountain. cross (the Potomac) and move 
> over to Frederick.You (should) judge whether you can pass around their 
> army without hindrance and cross the river east of the mountains. In 
> either case, after crossing the river, you must move on and feel (for) the 
> right of (our) troops, collecting information, & provisions.I think the 
> sooner you cross into Maryland, the better".
> But once Stuart found his intended north-bound road blocked by Union 
> infantry and he made his decision to continue with his plan, resulting in 
> his riding south while Lee advanced north, I believe that Stuart should be 
> held responsible for making a poor decision. In making plans, one has to 
> make certain assumptions. Stuart's assumption was the the AOP would not 
> be an obstacle. Once he got to the crossroad filled with Hancock's men, 
> it was clear his assumptions were wrong. When the key assumption of a 
> plan proves to be incorrect, the plan should be re-examined, and 
> cancellation of the plan should be one of the alternatives considered. 
> Stuart should have abandoned his plan then and there. He should be held 
> accountable for what occurred from that point onward.
>
> John Baniszewski
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> You may unsubscribe by going to 
> http://mailman.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg
>
> You can add yourself to the GDG map at: 
> http://www.frappr.com/gettysburgdiscussiongroup
>
> View archived posts from May 2004 - present at 
> http://mailman.arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg/
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------
You may unsubscribe by going to http://mailman.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg

You can add yourself to the GDG map at: http://www.frappr.com/gettysburgdiscussiongroup

View archived posts from May 2004 - present at http://mailman.arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg/